Kentucky health advocates ask U.S. House to reject Senate’s version of ‘big beautiful bill’ 

Republished from Kentucky Lantern

Kentucky health advocates are urging the U.S. House to reject Senate changes to a sweeping budget bill, warning the measure will leave many Kentuckians without access to medical care or food assistance. 

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed 51-50 thanks to a tiebreaking vote from Vice President JD Vance. It  would make deeper cuts to Medicaid than the House version while raising the debt limit by $5 trillion.

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul was one of three Republicans voting against the bill because it would be “adding to our debt.” The measure now returns to the House where some Republicans are unhappy with the Senate changes to safety net and green energy programs.

Jason Bailey, executive director of the Kentucky Center for Economic Policy, said the proposal will “strip health care and food assistance from millions of Americans and hundreds of thousands of Kentuckians, while ensuring the wealthiest households benefit from a bounty of new tax cuts.”  

“As Kentucky’s U.S. House delegation prepares to consider the Senate version of this bill, we urge the members to prioritize the vast majority of Kentuckians and oppose cuts to vital health care, food assistance, and education programs that are crucial to Kentuckians’ health and well-being and critical for our state’s economy,” Bailey said. 

The measure squeaked through the House 215-214 on May 22 along mostly party lines. Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky split with the GOP to vote against the bill, saying it would increase federal deficits and debt.  

The four other Republicans in Kentucky’s delegation voted for the bill, including Rep. Hal Rogers, whose Eastern Kentucky district is heavily dependent on Medicaid. Among Rogers’ constituents, 44 % are covered by the federal-state program that pays for 1 in 3 Kentuckians’ health care.

Alexus Richardson, the director of communications for the Louisville-based Dare to Care food bank, said the federal government would be “kicking people while they’re already down” if Congress gives final approval to the proposals, which is “the wrong message.” 

“Many families are already struggling. People have not caught up from the pandemic. That’s why we’re seeing long lines as it is,” she said. 

Here’s how advocates and health experts say the budget bill would affect Kentucky, by sector. 

Food assistance

Inside the Dare to Care food bank. March 14, 2025.(Kentucky Lantern photo by Sarah Ladd)

Both the House and Senate versions of the bill are “unacceptable,” Richardson with Dare to Care said. The Senate version proposes deeper cuts than the House’s, though. Among other proposals, the bill would shift costs of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, better known as SNAP, to states. 

Food banks, Richardson told the Lantern, are “already stretched to meet current needs” and “cuts to SNAP and Medicaid not only deepen food insecurity and poverty across our community, they also increase demand on food banks.” 

About 753,410 Kentuckians are food insecure, according to a May report from Feeding America. In 2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic, that number was 644,540. Being food insecure means a person may not have enough to eat and may not know where their next meal will come from. 

Alexus Richardson is the director of communications for Dare to Care. (Photo provided)

The bill heads back to the House for any revisions and another vote. 

“We urge our lawmakers to protect these critical programs, not cut them,” Richardson said. 

If these proposed cuts make it through, Dare to Care could have to turn people away or add new requirements to qualify for food aid. 

“We don’t want to do that. We really don’t want to have to place any kind of restrictions for what we know families need,” Richardson said. But, the organization needs resources to avoid that. “We’re here to fill in the gaps. We’re not here to replace federal programs like SNAP.” 

Kentucky hospitals

The Kentucky Hospital Association has not responded to a Lantern email seeking comment to Tuesday’s Senate vote. Nancy Galvagni, the organization’s president & CEO, signed onto a June 26 letter that warned the bill could hurt rural hospitals. 

“Rural hospitals, along with providers serving rural communities, face significant challenges and serve a large proportion of patients covered by Medicaid and Medicare, both of which reimburse hospitals and providers below the cost of care,” the letter, signed by 14 hospital associations, said. “Consequently, nearly half of rural hospitals operate with negative margins.” 

The letter warned that more than 750 rural hospitals are at risk of closing and 14 are at “immediate risk.” 

“We continue to remind our congressional delegations how all hospitals – rural, urban, and suburban – are key to the healthcare continuum and are facing headwinds that could destabilize health and healthcare in our states,” the hospital associations said. 

Family Health Centers

Family Health Centers, a nonprofit in Louisville, uses proceeds from the 340B program to pay for services for patients who can’t afford to pay. (Photo by Deborah Yetter)

Dr. Bart Irwin, the CEO of Family Health Centers (FHC) in Louisville, said he’s “saddened and disappointed at the Senate’s passage of HR1.” 

FHC provides health care services on a sliding-fee scale to people who are uninsured or have other barriers to getting health care. More than half of FHC’s patients have Medicaid, Irwin said. 

“This bill is ugly for Kentuckians and community health centers, like Family Health Centers,” he said. “This is a double whammy for patients, who are hardworking, disabled, caring for family members, or are in school.” 

He warned the bill would cause people to lose their Medicaid and become uninsured. 

“Patients who lose their Medicaid don’t go away; they return to community health centers as uninsured patients,” Irwin said. “It is likely that they will lose their health care providers as well since community health centers, like Family Health Centers, depend upon Medicaid payments to sustain their operations. The loss of Medicaid revenue and greatly increased uninsured patients will make health center operations unsustainable.” 

Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood’s Louisville health clinic. (Kentucky Lantern photo by Deborah Yetter)

In a Tuesday news release, Planned Parenthood said more than a third of its patients are covered by Medicaid and “blocking access to Planned Parenthood Medicaid enrollees would overwhelm Kentucky’s already overstretched safety net.”  

While not mentioning Planned Parenthood by name, the bill bans Medicaid payments to  clinics and providers that offer abortions even for other health care, such as cancer screenings, and family planning services they provide. 

“If this bill becomes law, thousands of patients who get care at Planned Parenthood’s two health centers in Kentucky would lose Medicaid coverage at their preferred provider, and many will be left with no alternative provider,” Planned Parenthood said. The organization has clinics in Louisville and Lexington.

Rebecca Gibron (Planned Parenthood photo)

Rebecca Gibron, the CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, which includes Kentucky, said the Senate vote “puts millions of lives at risk across the country, including here in Kentucky, meaning if this bill becomes law, the consequences will be catastrophic.” 

“Our health centers save Kentucky nearly $4.2 million each year by preventing unplanned pregnancies, catching cancers early, and controlling the spread of STIs,” Gibron said. “Stripping that care away, especially now—amid rural hospital closures, a maternal mortality crisis, and a deepening provider shortage—would push an already broken system past the brink.” 

Opioid Use Disorder 

In 2024, 142,312 Kentuckians received addiction services through Medicaid, according to the 2024 Drug Overdose Fatality Report.

Scottie Ellis, a spokesperson for Gov. Andy Beshear, said those services,“from medically-managed withdrawal to counseling and more” helped Kentucky’s overdose deaths decline three years in a row

“That progress is now at risk due to the ‘big, ugly bill’s’’ Medicaid cuts, which will cost lives and tear families apart,” Ellis said in a statement. “Gov. Andy Beshear has taken every opportunity to raise his voice about the risks and stand against these deadly cuts, including to state and federal leaders.” 

Politicians react

Kentucky’s Sen. Rand Paul posted on X, formerly Twitter, that he worked all night to stop Congress from adding to our debt” and in doing so “was fighting for the American people and against our out-of-control debt.” 

“I offered my vote for fiscal sanity,” Paul wrote. “Congress chose to sell out taxpayers instead. Only once the bill is released, we will know what the true price was.” 

Senator Mitch McConnell, on the other hand, praised the Senate’s work. 

“The American people sent President Trump and Republican majorities to Washington with a clear mandate: secure the border, restore peace through strength and American energy dominance, and give working families and small businesses relief from the Biden economy,” he said in a statement. “Our votes today are a step toward fulfilling that duty.” 

Kentucky Minority Floor Leader Rep. Pamela Stevenson, D-Louisville, posted on social media that the bill would  “devastate Kentucky.”  

“This bill is great for those rolling in money, but not good for every day Kentuckians — terminating healthcare is devastating for children, working families, the elderly, the disabled, and veterans,” Stevenson, who is running for McConnell’s seat as he isn’t seeking reelection, said in her X post. “This is NOT what the American people voted for. This is what DC politicians voted for.”  

In a video uploaded to Bluesky, Rep. Morgan McGarvey, a Louisville Democrat, called the bill “terrible” and said “I’ve landed in DC and I’m on my way to the House to do everything I can to try to stop it.” 

“This means having conversations with my Republican colleagues, asking them to stand up and do in public what they’re saying in private, that this bill is bad. It’s wrong and hurts people. It shouldn’t be hard.”   

This story may be updated. 

Kentucky Lantern is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Kentucky Lantern maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jamie Lucke for questions: [email protected]. Follow Kentucky Lantern on Facebook and Twitter. Kentucky Lantern stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Donate to Kentucky Lantern here.

https://kentuckylantern.com/2025/07/01/kentucky-health-advocates-ask-u-s-house-to-reject-senates-version-of-big-beautiful-bill/