🌎 Resumen en español · traducción automática
Se han presentado seis nuevas peticiones de habeas corpus en la Corte de Distrito de Estados Unidos para el Distrito Este de Kentucky, presentadas por personas detenidas en inmigración, principalmente en el Centro de Detención del Condado de Kenton en Covington, solicitando que un juez federal revise la legalidad o duración de su custodia. Hasta ahora en 2026, se han presentado 211 peticiones de este tipo en el distrito.
Traducción y resumen generados por IA a partir del artículo en inglés. Puede contener errores; consulte el texto original.
Six habeas corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 have been newly docketed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. These petitions are filed by individuals in immigration detention, primarily at the Kenton County Detention Center in Covington, and ask a federal judge to review the lawfulness or duration of their custody. To date in 2026, 211 such petitions have been filed in the district.
- Lozano-Hoyos v. Department of Homeland Security, Case No. 2:26-cv-00390, filed September 16, 2026, assigned to Judge Karen K. Caldwell
- Abdelasis v. Warden, Kenton County Jail, Case No. 2:26-cv-00389, filed September 15, 2026, assigned to Judge David L. Bunning
- Remy v. Daley, Case No. 2:26-cv-00388, filed September 14, 2026, assigned to Judge David L. Bunning
- Escobedo-Lopez v. Warden of the Kenton County Jail, Case No. 2:26-cv-00383, filed September 11, 2026, assigned to Judge S. Chad Meredith
- Yanes – DePaz v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Case No. 2:26-cv-00384, filed September 11, 2026, assigned to Judge Karen K. Caldwell
- Gomez v. Daley, Case No. 2:26-cv-00385, filed September 11, 2026, assigned to Judge David L. Bunning
Sources
This roundup was generated by AI (claude-haiku-4-5-20251001) from public U.S. District Court (Eastern District of Kentucky) docket records via CourtListener. It lists newly filed 28 U.S.C. § 2241 immigration-detention habeas petitions — case caption, docket number, filing date, and assigned judge — together with standing legal context. It does not characterize the contents or merits of any individual petition.
